C++ Logo


Advanced search

Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] labels

From: David Keaton <dmk_at_[hidden]>
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2020 11:41:20 -0700
      In the short run, I hope that a mutual agreement can be reached by
members of the two WGs having discussions like this one.

      I am discussing longer-term possibilities with Herb that would
result in closer collaboration between the two WGs on issues like this.


On 2020-08-12 10:23, Uecker, Martin wrote:
> Is this a mutual agreement?
> Best,
> Martin
> Am Mittwoch, den 12.08.2020, 09:41 -0700 schrieb David Keaton via Liaison:
>> I clearly made a mistake by not asking WG 14 to delay
>> consideration of a syntax change until after we had feedback from WG 21.
>> I apologize for that. Those who know me know that it is not my habit
>> to overlook liaison issues.
>> I would welcome a liaison submission from WG 21, or any other kind
>> of paper from individual members of WG 21, discussing the C++ view on
>> the subject and proposing a resolution that ends with the two languages
>> being as close as possible in this regard. This could include a change
>> to C, or a change to C++, or a change to both if appropriate.
>> David
>> _______________________________________________
>> Liaison mailing list
>> Liaison_at_[hidden]
>> Subscription: https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/liaison
>> Link to this post: http://lists.isocpp.org/liaison/2020/08/0156.php

Received on 2020-08-12 13:44:45