C++ Logo

std-proposals

Advanced search

Re: [std-proposals] P4174R0 Named, composable type sets for concept constraints

From: Muneem <itfllow123_at_[hidden]>
Date: Sat, 4 Apr 2026 04:01:12 +0500
In short, I was proposing heterogeneous lists with the same semantics as
std::array. I added the syntax and some other probably but minimal
semantical promises that could help my feature be better (all of Which are
in the proposal)

On Sat, 4 Apr 2026, 3:59 am Muneem, <itfllow123_at_[hidden]> wrote:

> I am really really sorry for the confusion(my earlier proposal was very
> broad and trying to play all sides to get feedback), this is the completely
> proposal where I updated my proposal to be clear:
> https://github.com/HjaldrKhilji/Future-potential-ISO-porposals/blob/main/Extension%20to%20runtime%20polymorphism.txt
> .
> I am really really sorry if my original proposal was overly general and
> minimal, but I made it so that I don't imply what's best without consulting
> and discussing from the ground up.
>
> On Sat, 4 Apr 2026, 2:42 am Barry Revzin via Std-Proposals, <
> std-proposals_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Apr 3, 2026 at 1:49 PM Emanuel Spiridon via Std-Proposals <
>> std-proposals_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>>
>>> I submitted the paper regarding this proposal, which can be read here:
>>> https://isocpp.org/files/papers/P4174R0.pdf
>>>
>>> I submitted it in time for the June 8th through 13th meetings in Brno,
>>> the last concern I have is that I can't go to Brno in person, and I also
>>> don't know anyone that can go in my place, while also understanding the
>>> concept of this proposal and its flaws.
>>>
>>> However, if someone on the mailing list is familiar with the core
>>> concept of the paper, is able to travel to Brno and attend the meeting, and
>>> could possibly have more questions about the proposal, then please contact
>>> me.
>>>
>>
>> I don't understand what's being proposed here.
>>
>> The paper is proposing three additions:
>>
>>
>> - type_tag_list, which is not mentioned anywhere else
>> - merge_tags_and_types_t, which is used in two places but not
>> explained, and
>> - tag_contains, which is not mentioned anywhere else either.
>>
>>
>> Can you clarify what specifically you are proposing?
>>
>> Barry
>> --
>> Std-Proposals mailing list
>> Std-Proposals_at_[hidden]
>> https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/std-proposals
>>
>

Received on 2026-04-03 23:01:25