N3377 concedes that N3355 was adopted. https://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/WG14/www/docs/n3377.pdf And is changing the label syntax on top of N3355.   The question is whether N3377 has been finally accepted or rejected.   -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von:Jens Maurer via Std-Proposals <std-proposals_at_[hidden]> Gesendet:Mo 06.01.2025 22:00 Betreff:Re: [std-proposals] Bringing break/continue with label to C++ An:std-proposals_at_[hidden]; Oliver Hunt <oliver_at_[hidden]>; CC:Jens Maurer <jens.maurer_at_[hidden]>; On 06/01/2025 21.15, Tiago Freire via Std-Proposals wrote: > I think that’s a misunderstanding, a proposal is different from it being adopted. It is not adopted. N3355 and N377 are both suggestions to change the C language, not C++, and they are still both open. On what basis are you making that statement? The draft minutes from the Fall WG14 meeting say: https://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG14/www/docs/n3372.pdf Celeste, Named loops, v3 n3355 (0.5 hours) [...] Straw Poll: Does WG14 want to adopt n3355 into C2y? 5+6-3+4-2+2 consensus (WG14 N3355 apparently was discussed twice during the WG14 meeting.) Jens -- Std-Proposals mailing list Std-Proposals_at_[hidden] https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/std-proposals