Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2025 22:00:02 +0100
On 06/01/2025 21.15, Tiago Freire via Std-Proposals wrote:
> I think that’s a misunderstanding, a proposal is different from it being adopted. It is not adopted. N3355 and N377 are both suggestions to change the C language, not C++, and they are still both open.
On what basis are you making that statement?
The draft minutes from the Fall WG14 meeting say:
https://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG14/www/docs/n3372.pdf
Celeste, Named loops, v3 n3355 (0.5 hours)
[...]
Straw Poll: Does WG14 want to adopt n3355 into C2y? 5+6-3+4-2+2 consensus
(WG14 N3355 apparently was discussed twice during the WG14 meeting.)
Jens
> I think that’s a misunderstanding, a proposal is different from it being adopted. It is not adopted. N3355 and N377 are both suggestions to change the C language, not C++, and they are still both open.
On what basis are you making that statement?
The draft minutes from the Fall WG14 meeting say:
https://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG14/www/docs/n3372.pdf
Celeste, Named loops, v3 n3355 (0.5 hours)
[...]
Straw Poll: Does WG14 want to adopt n3355 into C2y? 5+6-3+4-2+2 consensus
(WG14 N3355 apparently was discussed twice during the WG14 meeting.)
Jens
Received on 2025-01-06 21:00:10