N3377 concedes that N3355 was adopted.

https://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/WG14/www/docs/n3377.pdf

And is changing the label syntax on top of N3355.

The question is whether N3377 has been finally accepted or rejected.

-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Jens Maurer via Std-Proposals <std-proposals@lists.isocpp.org>
Gesendet: Mo 06.01.2025 22:00
Betreff: Re: [std-proposals] Bringing break/continue with label to C++
An: std-proposals@lists.isocpp.org; Oliver Hunt <oliver@apple.com>;
CC: Jens Maurer <jens.maurer@gmx.net>;


On 06/01/2025 21.15, Tiago Freire via Std-Proposals wrote:
> I think that’s a misunderstanding, a proposal is different from it being adopted. It is not adopted. N3355 and N377 are both suggestions to change the C language, not C++, and they are still both open.

On what basis are you making that statement?


The draft minutes from the Fall WG14 meeting say:

https://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG14/www/docs/n3372.pdf

Celeste, Named loops, v3 n3355 (0.5 hours)
[...]
Straw Poll: Does WG14 want to adopt n3355 into C2y? 5+6-3+4-2+2 consensus

(WG14 N3355 apparently was discussed twice during the WG14 meeting.)

Jens

--
Std-Proposals mailing list
Std-Proposals@lists.isocpp.org
https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/std-proposals