Good thing it's not about "make everyone happy" but general consensus.
________________________________
From: Std-Proposals <std-proposals-bounces_at_[hidden]> on behalf of Ville Voutilainen via Std-Proposals <std-proposals_at_[hidden]>
Sent: Friday, August 30, 2024 3:35:08 AM
To: Jeremy Rifkin <rifkin.jer_at_[hidden]>
Cc: Ville Voutilainen <ville.voutilainen_at_[hidden]>; std-proposals_at_[hidden] <std-proposals_at_[hidden]>; Tom Honermann <tom_at_[hidden]>
Subject: Re: [std-proposals] Revising #pragma once

On Fri, 30 Aug 2024 at 04:31, Jeremy Rifkin <rifkin.jer_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
> > I guess the best way forward is to send this proposal to WG21. I'll
> try to convince Gasper to help me write
> a response paper
>
> Absolutely, you're welcome to do that. That's how the process works
> and I trust good decisions to be made in voting. My sole interest is
> standardizing existing practice and if there are compelling technical
> reasons not to do so that is fine. This isn't personal to me, and I
> wish it wasn't personal to people in this thread. While passionate
> opinions are very understandable, it's too bad that conversations
> about topics like this can't be had without frustration.

Well, it's rather hard to have this conversation without frustration
because WG21 will reject
the paper, regardless of whether I produce that response paper. So
this is a waste of everybody's time.

--
Std-Proposals mailing list
Std-Proposals_at_[hidden]
https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/std-proposals