Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2024 04:35:08 +0300
On Fri, 30 Aug 2024 at 04:31, Jeremy Rifkin <rifkin.jer_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
> > I guess the best way forward is to send this proposal to WG21. I'll
> try to convince Gasper to help me write
> a response paper
>
> Absolutely, you're welcome to do that. That's how the process works
> and I trust good decisions to be made in voting. My sole interest is
> standardizing existing practice and if there are compelling technical
> reasons not to do so that is fine. This isn't personal to me, and I
> wish it wasn't personal to people in this thread. While passionate
> opinions are very understandable, it's too bad that conversations
> about topics like this can't be had without frustration.
Well, it's rather hard to have this conversation without frustration
because WG21 will reject
the paper, regardless of whether I produce that response paper. So
this is a waste of everybody's time.
>
> > I guess the best way forward is to send this proposal to WG21. I'll
> try to convince Gasper to help me write
> a response paper
>
> Absolutely, you're welcome to do that. That's how the process works
> and I trust good decisions to be made in voting. My sole interest is
> standardizing existing practice and if there are compelling technical
> reasons not to do so that is fine. This isn't personal to me, and I
> wish it wasn't personal to people in this thread. While passionate
> opinions are very understandable, it's too bad that conversations
> about topics like this can't be had without frustration.
Well, it's rather hard to have this conversation without frustration
because WG21 will reject
the paper, regardless of whether I produce that response paper. So
this is a waste of everybody's time.
Received on 2024-08-30 01:35:22