C++ Logo

std-proposals

Advanced search

Re: [std-proposals] Revising #pragma once

From: Tiago Freire <tmiguelf_at_[hidden]>
Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2024 06:10:20 +0000
I could equally argue that I have some library where updating to anything above C++14 is a problem in my case. In that case we can all just pack up, updating the standard is pointless, what are we even doing on this mailing list?

________________________________
From: Ville Voutilainen <ville.voutilainen_at_[hidden]>
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2024 8:00:39 AM
To: Tiago Freire <tmiguelf_at_[hidden]>
Cc: std-proposals_at_[hidden] <std-proposals_at_[hidden]>
Subject: Re: [std-proposals] Revising #pragma once

On Wed, 28 Aug 2024 at 08:15, Tiago Freire <tmiguelf_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
>
> I don't know about you

We can just edit the rest out, and right there we have an excellent
summary of the arguments of the proponents of this facility,
both now and a decade ago. It was pointed back then by vendors citing
use cases of people different from today that the uses
Gasper depicted in this discussion are a problem for #pragma once, and
nothing has changed since.

Received on 2024-08-28 06:10:24