Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2024 09:20:26 +0300
On Wed, 28 Aug 2024 at 09:10, Tiago Freire <tmiguelf_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
> I could equally argue that I have some library where updating to anything above C++14 is a problem in my case.
Maybe you could, but I wouldn't describe that as arguing _equally_,
considering that there's quite a bit more detail than that
provided in the descriptions that explain why #pragma once doesn't work.
>In that case we can all just pack up, updating the standard is pointless, what are we even doing on this mailing list?
Listening to feeble strawman argument attempts at insisting how the
arguments against #pragma once are invalid, even though they
demonstrably aren't?
>
> I could equally argue that I have some library where updating to anything above C++14 is a problem in my case.
Maybe you could, but I wouldn't describe that as arguing _equally_,
considering that there's quite a bit more detail than that
provided in the descriptions that explain why #pragma once doesn't work.
>In that case we can all just pack up, updating the standard is pointless, what are we even doing on this mailing list?
Listening to feeble strawman argument attempts at insisting how the
arguments against #pragma once are invalid, even though they
demonstrably aren't?
Received on 2024-08-28 06:20:40