On 13/07/2024 19:51, zxuiji wrote:
> But the other classes ARE stable, just not necessarily in ABI.
> Their behaviour is stable, that's the promise given by the API.
> It's the ABI they don't promise and std::stable does not imply
> to me (and likely many others) that it's addressing ABI issue.
> That's why I suggested stdabi:: since that implicitly implies that
> std:: has ABI issues that can catch devs unawares at times.

Good point, I see what you mean. I'm not hung up on names, if there is a
better choice I'll gladly accept it.


Hans Guijt