Date: Wed, 24 May 2023 18:08:38 +0200
On 24/05/2023 18:00, sasho648 via Std-Proposals wrote:
> Weird how that should even be concern of the committee. Just give the
> syntax and allow implementations to decide what can they implement as
> `constexpr` or not.
This just calls for... gratuitous implementation divergence?
My 2 c,
> Weird how that should even be concern of the committee. Just give the
> syntax and allow implementations to decide what can they implement as
> `constexpr` or not.
This just calls for... gratuitous implementation divergence?
My 2 c,
-- Giuseppe D'Angelo
Received on 2023-05-24 16:08:41