On Thu, 11 May 2023 at 09:34, Jonathan Wakely <cxx_at_[hidden]> wrote:

>
>
> On Thu, 11 May 2023 at 06:23, Andrew Tomazos via Std-Proposals <
> std-proposals_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
>> Please find below a LIVE LINK to a short 2-page proposal:
>>
>
> Aside: I find your habit of loudly calling these a LIVE LINK a little
> confusing, because Livelink is the official document repository for ISO
> working groups. All ISO C++ WG21 N-numbered papers get submitted to
> Livelink, but our P-numbered papers don't (that's one of the main reasons
> we started using P-numbers). So it's a bit confusing to see something that
> isn't even a P-paper yet referred to like that. I think everybody
> understands that google docs are "live" and can change.
>
>
>>
>> D2879R0 Proposal of Pythonesque std::print extensions
>>
>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1E5y_osldYmdBYxUQh8sBlGIEOxJ0FoRiXAJaJD4XATQ
>>
>> > We propose extensions to std::print/ln such that the format string is
>> automatically deduced and/or extended from the arguments to std::print/ln -
>> in a similar fashion to the existing practice of the Python `print`
>> function, and like other similar functions from other languages.
>>
>
>
> This would benefit from references to the specs for other languages,
> showing precisely how they handle these cases. At the very least, a
> reference for the Python equivalent that is prominently referred to.
>
>
I also expected to see discussion of how it changes the behaviour of valid
C++23 code.