C++ Logo


Advanced search

Re: [std-proposals] [Draft Proposal] Required attribute syntax

From: Bo Persson <bo_at_[hidden]>
Date: Thu, 4 May 2023 10:29:43 +0200
On 2023-05-04 at 09:47, Lauri Vasama via Std-Proposals wrote:
> Floating an idea i've been toying around with for a while concerning a
> new syntax for attributes with observable effects on program behaviour.
> https://vasama.github.io/wg21/Dxxx1 <https://vasama.github.io/wg21/Dxxx1>

Don't see that an exclamation mark is a good choice for "required", as
it elsewhere means "not".

Like [[packed]] is optional, but [[!packed]] should be required packing.
To me it look more like unpacked.

Received on 2023-05-04 08:29:51