Practical applications of the proposal can often be the examples used in
the table. That's the beauty of it. Many birds, one stone.


On Sat., Apr. 29, 2023, 12:06 p.m. Anoop Rana via Std-Proposals, <
std-proposals_at_[hidden]> wrote:

> This is the first revision so the draft is named DXXXXR1.pdf. Here the
> formatting of the tony table is fixed. I will work on other suggestions
> given in the last two emails(by Arthur and Jens) and will modify the
> proposal draft accordingly as soon as possible.
>
> Note only the formatting of the tony table has been updated in this
> revision and the practical applications of the proposal have not been added
> in this revision.
>
>
>
> Regards,
> Anoop Rana
>
>
>
> On Sat, 29 Apr 2023 at 20:07, Jens Maurer <jens.maurer_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On 29/04/2023 06.43, Anoop Rana via Std-Proposals wrote:
>> > Attached is the proposal to allow multiple template parameter packs for
>> class templates provided they can be deduced using CTAD.
>>
>> The "before - after" comparison should not just show "invalid";
>> it should show for "before" the workaround that you need to take
>> today to achieve the same result. I guess passing around several
>> tuples might work today.
>>
>> Jens
>>
>> --
> Std-Proposals mailing list
> Std-Proposals_at_[hidden]
> https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/std-proposals
>