Practical applications of the proposal can often be the examples used in the table. That's the beauty of it. Many birds, one stone.


On Sat., Apr. 29, 2023, 12:06 p.m. Anoop Rana via Std-Proposals, <std-proposals@lists.isocpp.org> wrote:
This is the first revision so the draft is named DXXXXR1.pdf. Here the formatting of the tony table is fixed. I will work on other suggestions given in the last two emails(by Arthur and Jens) and will modify the proposal draft accordingly as soon as possible.

Note only the formatting of the tony table has been updated in this revision and the practical applications of the proposal have not been added in this revision.



Regards,
Anoop Rana



On Sat, 29 Apr 2023 at 20:07, Jens Maurer <jens.maurer@gmx.net> wrote:


On 29/04/2023 06.43, Anoop Rana via Std-Proposals wrote:
> Attached is the proposal to allow multiple template parameter packs for class templates provided they can be deduced using CTAD.

The "before - after" comparison should not just show "invalid";
it should show for "before" the workaround that you need to take
today to achieve the same result.  I guess passing around several
tuples might work today.

Jens

--
Std-Proposals mailing list
Std-Proposals@lists.isocpp.org
https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/std-proposals