I noticed a typo in my last version where I typed {int} instead of {true}
for Proposed-U for the call `f<int, int, true>();`. This has been corrected
in this version. Since this is a trivial change I've named the document the
same as previous(DnnnnR0.pdf).


On Wed, 16 Nov 2022 at 04:12, Edward Catmur <ecatmur_at_[hidden]> wrote:

>
>
> On Mon, 14 Nov 2022 at 13:48, Anoop Rana via Std-Proposals <
> std-proposals_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
>> Attached is the proposal that aims to make the following program
>> well-formed:
>>
>> ```
>>
>> //----------------------vvvv--------------------->note U Is a nontype template parameter packtemplate<typename... T, bool... U> void f(){
>> }int main(){
>> f<int, double, true, false>(); //ill-formed as per current wording}
>>
>> ```
>>
>
> I don't see mention of P1985 in your proposal. ISTM that's in the same
> space and should be referenced.
>
> The complete proposal with all the necessary details is attached as a pdf
>> at the end of this email.
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>> Anoop Rana
>> --
>> Std-Proposals mailing list
>> Std-Proposals_at_[hidden]
>> https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/std-proposals
>>
>