Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2022 23:26:10 +0100
On Fri, 22 Jul 2022, 18:23 Thiago Macieira via Std-Proposals, <
std-proposals_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> On Friday, 22 July 2022 09:13:13 PDT Jefferson Carpenter via Std-Proposals
> wrote:
> > If so (if existing proposals are moving in this direction), great - if
> > not, I might be interested in working to make this possible.
>
> You need reflection. You're not going to get any traction on a proposal
> that
> doesn't use reflection.
>
Indeed.
There's very little chance of this taking the same name as std::array,
since that takes an unsigned and this would take a typename.
Also, how would you handle non contiguous enumerations?
I've recently implemented this using Boost Describe for reflection, and
it's very useful, but these need answering.
>
std-proposals_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> On Friday, 22 July 2022 09:13:13 PDT Jefferson Carpenter via Std-Proposals
> wrote:
> > If so (if existing proposals are moving in this direction), great - if
> > not, I might be interested in working to make this possible.
>
> You need reflection. You're not going to get any traction on a proposal
> that
> doesn't use reflection.
>
Indeed.
There's very little chance of this taking the same name as std::array,
since that takes an unsigned and this would take a typename.
Also, how would you handle non contiguous enumerations?
I've recently implemented this using Boost Describe for reflection, and
it's very useful, but these need answering.
>
Received on 2022-07-22 22:26:25