Date: Wed, 4 Aug 2021 00:48:54 -0500
On Tue, Aug 3, 2021 at 10:41 PM Phil Bouchard via Std-Proposals <
std-proposals_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> On 8/3/21 11:07 PM, Emile Cormier via Std-Proposals wrote:
>
> Sorry, but who do you expect to get involved in a C++ language extensions
> encumbered by patents? Does your "C++ Superset" allow a patent-free,
> open-source implementation?
>
> Part of what I mentioned is patent pending but I can certainly loosen
> restrictions, but the Root Pointer headers will remain patented.
>
> The title notably states that I am looking to start an an SCC / ISO IEC
> branch (which I am part of now) to build a framework allowing more robust
> functionalities such as what I previously mentioned.
>
The ISO patent policy: https://www.iso.org/iso-standards-and-patents.html
std-proposals_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> On 8/3/21 11:07 PM, Emile Cormier via Std-Proposals wrote:
>
> Sorry, but who do you expect to get involved in a C++ language extensions
> encumbered by patents? Does your "C++ Superset" allow a patent-free,
> open-source implementation?
>
> Part of what I mentioned is patent pending but I can certainly loosen
> restrictions, but the Root Pointer headers will remain patented.
>
> The title notably states that I am looking to start an an SCC / ISO IEC
> branch (which I am part of now) to build a framework allowing more robust
> functionalities such as what I previously mentioned.
>
The ISO patent policy: https://www.iso.org/iso-standards-and-patents.html
-- Nevin ":-)" Liber <mailto:nevin_at_[hidden] <nevin_at_[hidden]>> +1-847-691-1404
Received on 2021-08-04 00:49:34