Subject: Re: [std-proposals] Explicit using
From: BAILLY Yves (yves.bailly_at_[hidden])
Date: 2021-02-01 09:51:59
> > I think I get your point. After more thinking about it (which I should have done before, sorry for that), [...]
> No worries. I'm not expressing my points in the directest and clearest possible manner, either. I think we
> started at opposite vague extremes and are slowly "haggling" our way to meet somewhere in the middle.
> I started at "This is not possible"; you started at "This is possible." I'm still 100% certain that when we meet
> it'll be on the "This is not possible" side of the line... but we're still working our way there.
Well, no more way to work onâ¦ I give up. While preparing a much longer answer to your questions and to the remark from Martin KÃ¼ttler, I reach contradictions which I donât manage to resolve (for now at least) without going into too complex considerations or creating a new language â which is definitely what I donât want to do.
So as you said, it seems Iâm not able to cross that âthis is not possibleâ lineâ¦ But in all failure thereâs a lesson to learn ð
Thank you all for your time.
Manufacturing Intelligence division
M: +33 (0) 6.82.66.09.01
STD-PROPOSALS list run by email@example.com
Standard Proposals Archives on Google Groups