> > I think I get your point. After more thinking about it (which I should have done before, sorry for that), [...]

> No worries. I'm not expressing my points in the directest and clearest possible manner, either. I think we

> started at opposite vague extremes and are slowly "haggling" our way to meet somewhere in the middle.

> I started at "This is not possible"; you started at "This is possible." I'm still 100% certain that when we meet

> it'll be on the "This is not possible" side of the line... but we're still working our way there.


Well, no more way to work on… I give up. While preparing a much longer answer to your questions and to the remark from Martin Küttler, I reach contradictions which I don’t manage to resolve (for now at least) without going into too complex considerations or creating a new language – which is definitely what I don’t want to do.


So as you said, it seems I’m not able to cross that “this is not possible” line… But in all failure there’s a lesson to learn 😉


Thank you all for your time.




Yves Bailly
Development engineer
Manufacturing Intelligence division
M: +33 (0)