Subject: Re: [std-proposals] Proposal of constpub (DRAFT 1)
From: Andrew Tomazos (andrewtomazos_at_[hidden])
Date: 2020-01-13 12:14:37
This doesn't address the final concern in the paper, removing the need to
create two different names for the same thing. ie In your example the two
names `x` and `m_x` rather than just the one name `x`.
On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 3:15 AM Matthew Woehlke <mwoehlke.floss_at_[hidden]>
> On 21/11/2019 05.33, Andrew Tomazos via Std-Proposals wrote:
> > Please find attached a 2-page draft proposal entitled:
> > Proposal of constpub
> > It seems a little thing but easy to implement and I think it may have
> > appeal.
> > Anyway, initial thoughts appreciated.
> > -Andrew.
> I would rather see:
> class foo
> using x = std::as_const(m_x);
> int m_x;
> No new keywords, leverages the idea of "universal aliases", has more
> possible uses...
STD-PROPOSALS list run by email@example.com
Standard Proposals Archives on Google Groups