This doesn't address the final concern in the paper, removing the need to create two different names for the same thing. ie In your example the two names `x` and `m_x` rather than just the one name `x`.
On 21/11/2019 05.33, Andrew Tomazos via Std-Proposals wrote:
> Please find attached a 2-page draft proposal entitled:
>
> Proposal of constpub
>
> It seems a little thing but easy to implement and I think it may have broad
> appeal.
>
> Anyway, initial thoughts appreciated.
> -Andrew.
I would rather see:
class foo
{
public:
using x = std::as_const(m_x);
protected:
int m_x;
}
No new keywords, leverages the idea of "universal aliases", has more
possible uses...
--
Matthew