C++ Logo

STD-PROPOSALS

Advanced search

Subject: Re: [std-proposals] Proposal: Consistent Reflection Naming
From: Михаил Найденов (mihailnajdenov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2020-01-10 10:18:26


I have incorporated all the feedback, for which I am thankful, including
splitting the paper in two (removed the library naming part for now).

As a aside, it seems this Monday is the last date to send papers for the
next meeting. Is this correct?

On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 3:06 AM Magnus Fromreide <magfr_at_[hidden]>
wrote:

> On Thu, Jan 09, 2020 at 10:10:30AM -0500, Arthur O'Dwyer via Std-Proposals
> wrote:
> > Your objection to "reflexpr" sounds good to me. ("reflectof" sounds about
> > right, by analogy to "alignof" — neither one is grammatical, but they're
> > ungrammatical in analogous ways.)
>
> I agree and would suggest that this is presented as two separate papers in
> order to avoid that one of the parts prevents the other from moving
> forward.
>
> /MF
>






STD-PROPOSALS list run by std-proposals-owner@lists.isocpp.org

Standard Proposals Archives on Google Groups