C++ Logo


Advanced search

Re: Proposal: Consistent Reflection Naming

From: Михаил Найденов <mihailnajdenov_at_[hidden]>
Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2020 18:18:26 +0200
I have incorporated all the feedback, for which I am thankful, including
splitting the paper in two (removed the library naming part for now).

As a aside, it seems this Monday is the last date to send papers for the
next meeting. Is this correct?

On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 3:06 AM Magnus Fromreide <magfr_at_[hidden]>

> On Thu, Jan 09, 2020 at 10:10:30AM -0500, Arthur O'Dwyer via Std-Proposals
> wrote:
> > Your objection to "reflexpr" sounds good to me. ("reflectof" sounds about
> > right, by analogy to "alignof" — neither one is grammatical, but they're
> > ungrammatical in analogous ways.)
> I agree and would suggest that this is presented as two separate papers in
> order to avoid that one of the parts prevents the other from moving
> forward.
> /MF

Received on 2020-01-10 10:21:12