On Mon, Nov 25, 2024 at 5:19 PM mauro russo <ing.russomauro_at_[hidden]>
wrote:

> > I think this issue has to be reviewed by CWG.
>
> Sorry to be new about this processes, I don't see yet
> what is the difference between an issue with
> https://github.com/cplusplus/draft/issues/new
> or a CWG.
>

Editorial issues are reviewed by the editor. Core issues are reviewed by
CWG. Issues that require some deliberation by core language experts have to
go to CWG.


>
> > If you can propose a better (and correct) example
> > then please do. But you can also submit the issue
> > without it.
> ...
> > I think it would be ideal to amend the example
> > so that we still deduce to `A<int&>`, but obviously
> > if we end up not doing that, then we may not end
> > up with an error upon instantiation.
>
> I do not fill yet to master the specific intent
> of who designed those examples, therefore
> I would prefer just to report there is an issue
> there, without proposing a different example.
>
> Is it fair to proceed this way with
> https://github.com/cplusplus/draft/issues/new ?
>

Yes, you can submit the issue without any proposed resolution.


>
> Thank you.
>
>

-- 
*Brian Bi*