On Wed, 9 Jun 2021 at 19:17, Ville Voutilainen
<ville.voutilainen_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 9 Jun 2021 at 19:07, Brian Bi <bbi5291_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> >
> > I'm simply curious about which documents I should read in order to understand what to expect from implementations.
> >
> > The "working draft", as I understand it, is constantly updated. Which particular version of the working draft is the one that the committee has made the unusual step of recommending implementation vendors comply with instead of the International Standard?
>
> I fail to see what makes that step unusual. We've done that for
> decades with Core Issues, there's nothing new in it.
>
> > Perhaps the information I'm asking for is not publicly available. That's too bad.
>
> Well, as I said, the draft, the meeting minutes, the editor's report.
> It's all public.

I do also expect cppreference.com to track these things accurately, if
that's your cup of tea.