Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2021 18:11:11 +0200
On Wed, Jun 9, 2021, 18:04 Ville Voutilainen via Std-Discussion <
std-discussion_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> On Wed, 9 Jun 2021 at 19:00, Brian Bi <bbi5291_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> >
> > If there's no document handy that collects all of them, how are
> implementation vendors supposed to know which revisions they are being
> asked to implement?
>
> They can read the working draft, its editor's report, and individual
> proposal papers that were accepted into the working draft.
> Do you think you are solving some actual problem that exists in
> implementation vendors' ability to implement what the committee
> intends?
>
Oh. My. God. That the committee has serious process problems was already
clear, but this is really too much.
std-discussion_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> On Wed, 9 Jun 2021 at 19:00, Brian Bi <bbi5291_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> >
> > If there's no document handy that collects all of them, how are
> implementation vendors supposed to know which revisions they are being
> asked to implement?
>
> They can read the working draft, its editor's report, and individual
> proposal papers that were accepted into the working draft.
> Do you think you are solving some actual problem that exists in
> implementation vendors' ability to implement what the committee
> intends?
>
Oh. My. God. That the committee has serious process problems was already
clear, but this is really too much.
-- -- .:: Gennaro Prota ::. .:: https://about.me/gennaro ::. >
Received on 2021-06-09 11:11:24