I'm simply curious about which documents I should read in order to
understand what to expect from implementations.

The "working draft", as I understand it, is constantly updated. Which
particular version of the working draft is the one that the committee has
made the unusual step of recommending implementation vendors comply with
instead of the International Standard?

Perhaps the information I'm asking for is not publicly available. That's
too bad.

On Wed, Jun 9, 2021 at 12:03 PM Ville Voutilainen <
ville.voutilainen_at_[hidden]> wrote:

> On Wed, 9 Jun 2021 at 19:00, Brian Bi <bbi5291_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> >
> > If there's no document handy that collects all of them, how are
> implementation vendors supposed to know which revisions they are being
> asked to implement?
>
> They can read the working draft, its editor's report, and individual
> proposal papers that were accepted into the working draft.
> Do you think you are solving some actual problem that exists in
> implementation vendors' ability to implement what the committee
> intends?
>

-- 
*Brian Bi*