On Tue, Feb 22, 2022, 3:41 AM Matus Chochlik <chochlik_at_[hidden]> wrote:

> Hi,
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 22, 2022 at 10:31 AM Barry Revzin <barry.revzin_at_[hidden]>
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 22, 2022, 12:41 AM Matus Chochlik via Lib-Ext <
>> lib-ext_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi SG7
>>>
>>> On Tue, Feb 8, 2022 at 11:17 AM Hana Dusíková via Lib-Ext <
>>> lib-ext_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hello wonderful SG7! (and LEWG + EWG) ❤️
>>>>
>>>> We will have a reflection meeting where we will continue discussion
>>>> about P1240R2 (
>>>> http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2022/p1240r2.pdf)
>>>>
>>>> Daveed will continue with his presentation from last time.
>>>>
>>>
>>> If at all possible I'd like for us also to have a discussion about the
>>> direction and maybe some subsequent actions.
>>> I have made some slides comparing the "value-based" (VB, aka
>>> "non-hana-consteval") vs. "type-based" (TB, I guess "hana-consteval")
>>> reflection designs and also quite a lot of measurements of
>>> compilation-times:
>>>
>>
>> Can we please, please just spell out value-based and type-based? There is
>> no reason whatsoever that this needs to be abbreviated.
>>
>
> I've tried to explain that in the attached presentation. If there is
> anything unclear, I'd happy to clarify further and to adopt any new or
> already established names for these two approaches if you can provide them.
>

Value-based and type-based are already the established names. People
generally understand what those are.

VB and TB are not the established names. Nobody knows what those mean in
this context.

I am simply asking that you use words instead of initials.



>
>>
>> I am interested in reading about the comparison between the value- and
>> type-based approaches.
>>
>
> Less so about the Visual Basic and Tuberculosis approaches.
>>
> Again, if you can provide me with better nomenclature, I'll do better and
> spell the names out fully in any subsequent conversation even if I have to
> mention them multiple times, if it helps to clarify my position.
>
>>
>> Thank you,
>>
> Thank you.
>
> Matus
>