Hi,

On Tue, Feb 22, 2022 at 10:31 AM Barry Revzin <barry.revzin@gmail.com> wrote:

On Tue, Feb 22, 2022, 12:41 AM Matus Chochlik via Lib-Ext <lib-ext@lists.isocpp.org> wrote:

Hi SG7

On Tue, Feb 8, 2022 at 11:17 AM Hana Dusíková via Lib-Ext <lib-ext@lists.isocpp.org> wrote:

Hello wonderful SG7! (and LEWG + EWG) ❤️ 

We will have a reflection meeting where we will continue discussion about P1240R2 (http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2022/p1240r2.pdf)

Daveed will continue with his presentation from last time.

If at all possible I'd like for us also to have a discussion about the direction and maybe some subsequent actions.

I have made some slides comparing the "value-based" (VB, aka "non-hana-consteval") vs. "type-based" (TB, I guess "hana-consteval") reflection designs and also quite a lot of measurements of compilation-times:

Can we please, please just spell out value-based and type-based? There is no reason whatsoever that this needs to be abbreviated.

I've tried to explain that in the attached presentation. If there is anything unclear, I'd happy to clarify further and to adopt any new or already established names for these two approaches if you can provide them.

 

I am interested in reading about the comparison between the value- and type-based approaches.

Less so about the Visual Basic and Tuberculosis approaches. 

Again, if you can provide me with better nomenclature, I'll do better and spell the names out fully in any subsequent conversation even if I have to mention them multiple times, if it helps to clarify my position.

Thank you,

Thank you.

Matus