Subject: Re: [isocpp-ext] P2320: "The Syntax of Static Reflection" feedback request
From: RenÃ© Ferdinand Rivera Morell (grafikrobot_at_[hidden])
Date: 2021-04-07 09:15:50
First, sorry for the late reply, I blame slow paper reading :-) Can someone
clarify something that I must be missing about the proposed splice syntax.
Is there rationale for why one needs any splice syntax at all given that
the reflections are strongly typed? At a, probably very ignorant, high
level it appears to me that you could just have the reflected names without
the "[:R:]". What am I missing?
On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 3:26 PM Hana DusÃkovÃ¡ via Ext <ext_at_[hidden]>
> Andrew, Wyatt, and Daveed kindly finished the paper which was mentioned
> during last SG7 session and because the next SG7 meeting is next week *I
> would like all of you to read the paper and send feedback to SG7 mailing
> list*, so we have as much of information as possible.
> The paper is here: https://isocpp.org/files/papers/P2320R0.pdf and it
> will be part of the next mailing.
> Ext mailing list
> Subscription: https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/ext
> Link to this post: http://lists.isocpp.org/ext/2021/02/15887.php
-- -- RenÃ© Ferdinand Rivera Morell -- Don't Assume Anything -- No Supone Nada -- Robot Dreams - http://robot-dreams.net
SG7 list run by email@example.com
Older Archives on Google Groups