Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2020 20:13:18 +0100
On 04/03/2020 19.30, Michael L. Scott wrote:
> The last two bullets in Sec. 8.8 (the ones currently in blue) are syntactically inconsistent with the rest. I think the “or” at the end of the 5th bullet needs to be removed, the 6th bullet needs a semicolon rather than a comma at the end, and the 7th bullet needs a semicolon rather than a colon before the final “or”.
Fixed: http://wiki.edg.com/pub/Wg21prague/SG5/d2066r2.html
Thanks,
Jens
> - Michael
>
>> On Mar 4, 2020, at 12:08 AM, Hans Boehm <boehm_at_[hidden] <mailto:boehm_at_[hidden]>> wrote:
>>
>> The latest draft of the TM-lite proposal that I'm aware of is at
>>
>> http://wiki.edg.com/pub/Wg21prague/SG1/d2066r1.html
>>
>> I'm assuming we will meet at 10;15PST/1:15EST again tomorrow to see whether we can identify any further issues in the proposal. Let me know if this time doesn't work at all for you.
>>
>> Meeting ID
>> meet.google.com/sbj-cvgh-vnd <http://meet.google.com/sbj-cvgh-vnd>
>>
>> Phone Numbers
>> (US)
>> +1 208-925-0196
>> PIN: 255 542#
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 4, 2020 at 1:51 PM Hans Boehm <boehm_at_[hidden] <mailto:boehm_at_[hidden]>> wrote:
>>
>> Let's split the difference, and do 1:15 EST = 10:15 PST = 7:15 CET tomorrow, Wednesday. That'll force two people to each miss 15 minutes.
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 4, 2020 at 1:19 PM Victor Luchangco <victor.luchangco.work_at_[hidden] <mailto:victor.luchangco.work_at_[hidden]>> wrote:
>>
>> This week, any time from 11:30am to 5pm ET works for me.
>>
>> For a regular meeting, I can usually make most afternoons (ET), but Tuesday is generally not as good.
>>
>> - Victor
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 4, 2020 at 7:53 AM Michael L. Scott <mlscott_at_[hidden] <mailto:mlscott_at_[hidden]>> wrote:
>>
>> I'm available 1:30-5 Eastern this week, but not 1-1:30.
>>
>>> On Feb 4, 2020, at 1:07 AM, Hans Boehm <boehm_at_[hidden] <mailto:boehm_at_[hidden]>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> I could do W 1:00-2:00 EST as well.
>>>
>>> On Mon, Feb 3, 2020 at 8:31 PM Michael Spear <mfs409_at_[hidden] <mailto:mfs409_at_[hidden]>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Hans,
>>>
>>> Wednesdays I am not available from 2:00-3:30, so I'd only be able to attend the first half.
>>>
>>> - Mike
>>>
>>> On Mon, Feb 3, 2020 at 11:29 PM Hans Boehm <boehm_at_[hidden] <mailto:boehm_at_[hidden]>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Do Wednesdays 10:30 PST = 1:30 EST work for others, too? It would be nice to get one more meeting in before the WG21 meeting in Prague next week.
>>>
>>> On Mon, Feb 3, 2020 at 7:11 PM Michael L. Scott <mlscott_at_[hidden] <mailto:mlscott_at_[hidden]>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Nothing works for me this Thurs. Every second Thurs (inc. next Thurs) I'm available 9-1:45 Eastern. Fridays are completely out. Mondays after good except 11:45-12:15. Tuesdays are good 9-11:15 or 12:15-1:45. Wednesdays are good 9-2:45.
>>>
>>> - Michael
>>>
>>>> On Feb 3, 2020, at 9:22 PM, Michael Spear <mfs409_at_[hidden] <mailto:mfs409_at_[hidden]>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> My only hard constraint this semester is 2:00-3:30 M/W. Other than that, I can make just about anything work.
>>>>
>>>> - Mike
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Feb 3, 2020 at 9:05 PM Hans Boehm <boehm_at_[hidden] <mailto:boehm_at_[hidden]>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> You should probably drop the meeting@ email address if you want to reply publicly. And I should probably not have cross-posted for this reason.
>>>>
>>>> What's a better alternative? 10:30 generally works fairly well for me. Earlier is mostly bad for me because my Google meetings tend to want a Europe-friendly time. Much later than 10:30 makes it so Europe-unfriendly that we may cut into our participation.
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Feb 3, 2020 at 5:39 PM Michael L. Scott <mlscott_at_[hidden] <mailto:mlscott_at_[hidden]>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> This was rejected by the listserve. I forget which of my smtp options it insists on.
>>>>
>>>> Begin forwarded message:
>>>>
>>>>> *From:* "Michael L. Scott via SG5" <sg5_at_[hidden] <mailto:sg5_at_[hidden]>>
>>>>> *Date:* February 3, 2020 at 8:33:03 PM EST
>>>>> *To:* sg5_at_[hidden] <mailto:sg5_at_[hidden]>
>>>>> *Cc:* "Michael L. Scott" <mlscott_at_[hidden] <mailto:mlscott_at_[hidden]>>, meeting_at_[hidden] <mailto:meeting_at_[hidden]>
>>>>> *Subject:* *Re: [SG5] SG5 in Prague*
>>>>> *Reply-To:* sg5_at_[hidden] <mailto:sg5_at_[hidden]>
>>>>>
>>>>> Sadly, this has become a bad meeting time for me. I teach from 2:00-3:15 Eastern Time this semester.
>>>>>
>>>>> - Michael
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Feb 3, 2020, at 8:15 PM, Hans Boehm via SG5 <sg5_at_[hidden] <mailto:sg5_at_[hidden]>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> SG5 will not meet in Prague, since most of the regulars will not be in attendance.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I do expect we will have our regularly scheduled teleconference at 10:30am PST on Thursday before the meeting, and I'm hoping for some SG1 discussion of P2066 which somewhat unexpectedly materialized in the mailing. (Thanks, Jens!)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> SG5 mailing list
>>>>>> SG5_at_[hidden] <mailto:SG5_at_[hidden]>
>>>>>> https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/sg5
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> SG5 mailing list
>>>>> SG5_at_[hidden] <mailto:SG5_at_[hidden]>
>>>>> https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/sg5
>>>>
>
> The last two bullets in Sec. 8.8 (the ones currently in blue) are syntactically inconsistent with the rest. I think the “or” at the end of the 5th bullet needs to be removed, the 6th bullet needs a semicolon rather than a comma at the end, and the 7th bullet needs a semicolon rather than a colon before the final “or”.
Fixed: http://wiki.edg.com/pub/Wg21prague/SG5/d2066r2.html
Thanks,
Jens
> - Michael
>
>> On Mar 4, 2020, at 12:08 AM, Hans Boehm <boehm_at_[hidden] <mailto:boehm_at_[hidden]>> wrote:
>>
>> The latest draft of the TM-lite proposal that I'm aware of is at
>>
>> http://wiki.edg.com/pub/Wg21prague/SG1/d2066r1.html
>>
>> I'm assuming we will meet at 10;15PST/1:15EST again tomorrow to see whether we can identify any further issues in the proposal. Let me know if this time doesn't work at all for you.
>>
>> Meeting ID
>> meet.google.com/sbj-cvgh-vnd <http://meet.google.com/sbj-cvgh-vnd>
>>
>> Phone Numbers
>> (US)
>> +1 208-925-0196
>> PIN: 255 542#
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 4, 2020 at 1:51 PM Hans Boehm <boehm_at_[hidden] <mailto:boehm_at_[hidden]>> wrote:
>>
>> Let's split the difference, and do 1:15 EST = 10:15 PST = 7:15 CET tomorrow, Wednesday. That'll force two people to each miss 15 minutes.
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 4, 2020 at 1:19 PM Victor Luchangco <victor.luchangco.work_at_[hidden] <mailto:victor.luchangco.work_at_[hidden]>> wrote:
>>
>> This week, any time from 11:30am to 5pm ET works for me.
>>
>> For a regular meeting, I can usually make most afternoons (ET), but Tuesday is generally not as good.
>>
>> - Victor
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 4, 2020 at 7:53 AM Michael L. Scott <mlscott_at_[hidden] <mailto:mlscott_at_[hidden]>> wrote:
>>
>> I'm available 1:30-5 Eastern this week, but not 1-1:30.
>>
>>> On Feb 4, 2020, at 1:07 AM, Hans Boehm <boehm_at_[hidden] <mailto:boehm_at_[hidden]>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> I could do W 1:00-2:00 EST as well.
>>>
>>> On Mon, Feb 3, 2020 at 8:31 PM Michael Spear <mfs409_at_[hidden] <mailto:mfs409_at_[hidden]>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Hans,
>>>
>>> Wednesdays I am not available from 2:00-3:30, so I'd only be able to attend the first half.
>>>
>>> - Mike
>>>
>>> On Mon, Feb 3, 2020 at 11:29 PM Hans Boehm <boehm_at_[hidden] <mailto:boehm_at_[hidden]>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Do Wednesdays 10:30 PST = 1:30 EST work for others, too? It would be nice to get one more meeting in before the WG21 meeting in Prague next week.
>>>
>>> On Mon, Feb 3, 2020 at 7:11 PM Michael L. Scott <mlscott_at_[hidden] <mailto:mlscott_at_[hidden]>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Nothing works for me this Thurs. Every second Thurs (inc. next Thurs) I'm available 9-1:45 Eastern. Fridays are completely out. Mondays after good except 11:45-12:15. Tuesdays are good 9-11:15 or 12:15-1:45. Wednesdays are good 9-2:45.
>>>
>>> - Michael
>>>
>>>> On Feb 3, 2020, at 9:22 PM, Michael Spear <mfs409_at_[hidden] <mailto:mfs409_at_[hidden]>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> My only hard constraint this semester is 2:00-3:30 M/W. Other than that, I can make just about anything work.
>>>>
>>>> - Mike
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Feb 3, 2020 at 9:05 PM Hans Boehm <boehm_at_[hidden] <mailto:boehm_at_[hidden]>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> You should probably drop the meeting@ email address if you want to reply publicly. And I should probably not have cross-posted for this reason.
>>>>
>>>> What's a better alternative? 10:30 generally works fairly well for me. Earlier is mostly bad for me because my Google meetings tend to want a Europe-friendly time. Much later than 10:30 makes it so Europe-unfriendly that we may cut into our participation.
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Feb 3, 2020 at 5:39 PM Michael L. Scott <mlscott_at_[hidden] <mailto:mlscott_at_[hidden]>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> This was rejected by the listserve. I forget which of my smtp options it insists on.
>>>>
>>>> Begin forwarded message:
>>>>
>>>>> *From:* "Michael L. Scott via SG5" <sg5_at_[hidden] <mailto:sg5_at_[hidden]>>
>>>>> *Date:* February 3, 2020 at 8:33:03 PM EST
>>>>> *To:* sg5_at_[hidden] <mailto:sg5_at_[hidden]>
>>>>> *Cc:* "Michael L. Scott" <mlscott_at_[hidden] <mailto:mlscott_at_[hidden]>>, meeting_at_[hidden] <mailto:meeting_at_[hidden]>
>>>>> *Subject:* *Re: [SG5] SG5 in Prague*
>>>>> *Reply-To:* sg5_at_[hidden] <mailto:sg5_at_[hidden]>
>>>>>
>>>>> Sadly, this has become a bad meeting time for me. I teach from 2:00-3:15 Eastern Time this semester.
>>>>>
>>>>> - Michael
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Feb 3, 2020, at 8:15 PM, Hans Boehm via SG5 <sg5_at_[hidden] <mailto:sg5_at_[hidden]>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> SG5 will not meet in Prague, since most of the regulars will not be in attendance.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I do expect we will have our regularly scheduled teleconference at 10:30am PST on Thursday before the meeting, and I'm hoping for some SG1 discussion of P2066 which somewhat unexpectedly materialized in the mailing. (Thanks, Jens!)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> SG5 mailing list
>>>>>> SG5_at_[hidden] <mailto:SG5_at_[hidden]>
>>>>>> https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/sg5
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> SG5 mailing list
>>>>> SG5_at_[hidden] <mailto:SG5_at_[hidden]>
>>>>> https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/sg5
>>>>
>
Received on 2020-03-04 13:16:27