I'll try to log in as fast as I can, but may be a bit late as well.

- Michael

> On Mar 4, 2020, at 11:36 AM, Michael Spear <mfs409_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
> Hi Hans,
>
> I might be a few minutes late.
>
> Mike
>
> On Wed, Mar 4, 2020, 12:08 AM Hans Boehm <boehm_at_[hidden] <mailto:boehm_at_[hidden]>> wrote:
> The latest draft of the TM-lite proposal that I'm aware of is at
>
> http://wiki.edg.com/pub/Wg21prague/SG1/d2066r1.html <http://wiki.edg.com/pub/Wg21prague/SG1/d2066r1.html>
>
> I'm assuming we will meet at 10;15PST/1:15EST again tomorrow to see whether we can identify any further issues in the proposal. Let me know if this time doesn't work at all for you.
>
> Meeting ID
> meet.google.com/sbj-cvgh-vnd <http://meet.google.com/sbj-cvgh-vnd>
>
> Phone Numbers
> (‪US‬)
> ‪+1 208-925-0196‬
> PIN: ‪255 542#‬
>
> On Tue, Feb 4, 2020 at 1:51 PM Hans Boehm <boehm_at_[hidden] <mailto:boehm_at_[hidden]>> wrote:
> Let's split the difference, and do 1:15 EST = 10:15 PST = 7:15 CET tomorrow, Wednesday. That'll force two people to each miss 15 minutes.
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 4, 2020 at 1:19 PM Victor Luchangco <victor.luchangco.work_at_[hidden] <mailto:victor.luchangco.work_at_[hidden]>> wrote:
> This week, any time from 11:30am to 5pm ET works for me.
>
> For a regular meeting, I can usually make most afternoons (ET), but Tuesday is generally not as good.
>
> - Victor
>
> On Tue, Feb 4, 2020 at 7:53 AM Michael L. Scott <mlscott_at_[hidden] <mailto:mlscott_at_[hidden]>> wrote:
> I'm available 1:30-5 Eastern this week, but not 1-1:30.
>
>> On Feb 4, 2020, at 1:07 AM, Hans Boehm <boehm_at_[hidden] <mailto:boehm_at_[hidden]>> wrote:
>>
>> 
>> I could do W 1:00-2:00 EST as well.
>>
>> On Mon, Feb 3, 2020 at 8:31 PM Michael Spear <mfs409_at_[hidden] <mailto:mfs409_at_[hidden]>> wrote:
>> Hi Hans,
>>
>> Wednesdays I am not available from 2:00-3:30, so I'd only be able to attend the first half.
>>
>> - Mike
>>
>> On Mon, Feb 3, 2020 at 11:29 PM Hans Boehm <boehm_at_[hidden] <mailto:boehm_at_[hidden]>> wrote:
>> Do Wednesdays 10:30 PST = 1:30 EST work for others, too? It would be nice to get one more meeting in before the WG21 meeting in Prague next week.
>>
>> On Mon, Feb 3, 2020 at 7:11 PM Michael L. Scott <mlscott_at_[hidden] <mailto:mlscott_at_[hidden]>> wrote:
>> Nothing works for me this Thurs. Every second Thurs (inc. next Thurs) I'm available 9-1:45 Eastern. Fridays are completely out. Mondays after good except 11:45-12:15. Tuesdays are good 9-11:15 or 12:15-1:45. Wednesdays are good 9-2:45.
>>
>> - Michael
>>
>>> On Feb 3, 2020, at 9:22 PM, Michael Spear <mfs409_at_[hidden] <mailto:mfs409_at_[hidden]>> wrote:
>>>
>>> My only hard constraint this semester is 2:00-3:30 M/W. Other than that, I can make just about anything work.
>>>
>>> - Mike
>>>
>>> On Mon, Feb 3, 2020 at 9:05 PM Hans Boehm <boehm_at_[hidden] <mailto:boehm_at_[hidden]>> wrote:
>>> You should probably drop the meeting@ email address if you want to reply publicly. And I should probably not have cross-posted for this reason.
>>>
>>> What's a better alternative? 10:30 generally works fairly well for me. Earlier is mostly bad for me because my Google meetings tend to want a Europe-friendly time. Much later than 10:30 makes it so Europe-unfriendly that we may cut into our participation.
>>>
>>> On Mon, Feb 3, 2020 at 5:39 PM Michael L. Scott <mlscott_at_[hidden] <mailto:mlscott_at_[hidden]>> wrote:
>>> This was rejected by the listserve. I forget which of my smtp options it insists on.
>>>
>>> Begin forwarded message:
>>>
>>>> From: "Michael L. Scott via SG5" <sg5_at_[hidden] <mailto:sg5_at_[hidden]>>
>>>> Date: February 3, 2020 at 8:33:03 PM EST
>>>> To: sg5_at_[hidden] <mailto:sg5_at_[hidden]>
>>>> Cc: "Michael L. Scott" <mlscott_at_[hidden] <mailto:mlscott_at_[hidden]>>, meeting_at_[hidden] <mailto:meeting_at_[hidden]>
>>>> Subject: Re: [SG5] SG5 in Prague
>>>> Reply-To: sg5_at_[hidden] <mailto:sg5_at_[hidden]>
>>>>
>>>> Sadly, this has become a bad meeting time for me. I teach from 2:00-3:15 Eastern Time this semester.
>>>>
>>>> - Michael
>>>>
>>>>> On Feb 3, 2020, at 8:15 PM, Hans Boehm via SG5 <sg5_at_[hidden] <mailto:sg5_at_[hidden]>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> SG5 will not meet in Prague, since most of the regulars will not be in attendance.
>>>>>
>>>>> I do expect we will have our regularly scheduled teleconference at 10:30am PST on Thursday before the meeting, and I'm hoping for some SG1 discussion of P2066 which somewhat unexpectedly materialized in the mailing. (Thanks, Jens!)
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> SG5 mailing list
>>>>> SG5_at_[hidden] <mailto:SG5_at_[hidden]>
>>>>> https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/sg5 <https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/sg5>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> SG5 mailing list
>>>> SG5_at_[hidden] <mailto:SG5_at_[hidden]>
>>>> https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/sg5 <https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/sg5>