On Mar 4, 2020, at 11:36 AM, Michael Spear <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:Hi Hans,I might be a few minutes late.MikeOn Wed, Mar 4, 2020, 12:08 AM Hans Boehm <email@example.com> wrote:The latest draft of the TM-lite proposal that I'm aware of is atI'm assuming we will meet at 10;15PST/1:15EST again tomorrow to see whether we can identify any further issues in the proposal. Let me know if this time doesn't work at all for you.Meeting IDmeet.google.com/sbj-cvgh-vnd
PIN: 255 542#On Tue, Feb 4, 2020 at 1:51 PM Hans Boehm <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:Let's split the difference, and do 1:15 EST = 10:15 PST = 7:15 CET tomorrow, Wednesday. That'll force two people to each miss 15 minutes.On Tue, Feb 4, 2020 at 1:19 PM Victor Luchangco <email@example.com> wrote:This week, any time from 11:30am to 5pm ET works for me.For a regular meeting, I can usually make most afternoons (ET), but Tuesday is generally not as good.- VictorOn Tue, Feb 4, 2020 at 7:53 AM Michael L. Scott <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:I'm available 1:30-5 Eastern this week, but not 1-1:30.On Feb 4, 2020, at 1:07 AM, Hans Boehm <email@example.com> wrote:I could do W 1:00-2:00 EST as well.On Mon, Feb 3, 2020 at 8:31 PM Michael Spear <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:Hi Hans,Wednesdays I am not available from 2:00-3:30, so I'd only be able to attend the first half.- MikeOn Mon, Feb 3, 2020 at 11:29 PM Hans Boehm <email@example.com> wrote:Do Wednesdays 10:30 PST = 1:30 EST work for others, too? It would be nice to get one more meeting in before the WG21 meeting in Prague next week.On Mon, Feb 3, 2020 at 7:11 PM Michael L. Scott <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:Nothing works for me this Thurs. Every second Thurs (inc. next Thurs) I'm available 9-1:45 Eastern. Fridays are completely out. Mondays after good except 11:45-12:15. Tuesdays are good 9-11:15 or 12:15-1:45. Wednesdays are good 9-2:45.- MichaelOn Feb 3, 2020, at 9:22 PM, Michael Spear <email@example.com> wrote:My only hard constraint this semester is 2:00-3:30 M/W. Other than that, I can make just about anything work.- MikeOn Mon, Feb 3, 2020 at 9:05 PM Hans Boehm <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:You should probably drop the meeting@ email address if you want to reply publicly. And I should probably not have cross-posted for this reason.What's a better alternative? 10:30 generally works fairly well for me. Earlier is mostly bad for me because my Google meetings tend to want a Europe-friendly time. Much later than 10:30 makes it so Europe-unfriendly that we may cut into our participation.On Mon, Feb 3, 2020 at 5:39 PM Michael L. Scott <email@example.com> wrote:This was rejected by the listserve. I forget which of my smtp options it insists on.
Begin forwarded message:Sadly, this has become a bad meeting time for me. I teach from 2:00-3:15 Eastern Time this semester.
- MichaelOn Feb 3, 2020, at 8:15 PM, Hans Boehm via SG5 <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:SG5 will not meet in Prague, since most of the regulars will not be in attendance.I do expect we will have our regularly scheduled teleconference at 10:30am PST on Thursday before the meeting, and I'm hoping for some SG1 discussion of P2066 which somewhat unexpectedly materialized in the mailing. (Thanks, Jens!)--SG5 mailing list
SG5 mailing list