Date: Sun, 22 Nov 2020 18:27:41 -0500
On Sun, Nov 22, 2020, 18:24 Tony V E via Ext <ext_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> We could have reused static! (again)
>
> int x = static f();
>
Given an additional round of bikeshedding, I'm pretty sure we would have
settled on constatic.
> We could have reused static! (again)
>
> int x = static f();
>
Given an additional round of bikeshedding, I'm pretty sure we would have
settled on constatic.
Received on 2020-11-22 17:27:56