I don't remember if the decision about P1389 was shared with this mailing
list. I think it was expected to be discussed during Belfast.
Any result?
Anything other interesting decision from Belfast that wasn't mentioned?
(E.g. this evolution of the Module-based paper comes without much context
for me.)

Thanks!
Yehezkel

On Fri, Dec 13, 2019 at 8:06 PM JC van Winkel via SG20 <
sg20_at_[hidden]> wrote:

>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ---------
> From: Neil Horlock <nhorlock_at_[hidden]>
> Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2019 at 17:40
> Subject: minutes of meeting
> To: JC van Winkel <jcvw_at_[hidden]>
>
>
> Hi JC,
> Here are the minutes.
>
> Regards
>
> Neil
>
> --------------
> Attendees:
> NH - Neil Horlock
> JC - JC Van Winkel (chair)
> FS - Florian Sattler
> KG - Kate Gregory
> MA - Michael Adams
> CJDB - Chris Di Bella
>
> Notetaker: Neil Horlock
>
> Adoption of Agenda: agreed.
>
> Unanimous consent on minutes from the last meeting.
>
> Summary of Belfast:
> Bob Steagall helped to outline a plan which we are now executing.
> The core of the plan is the issue tracker which has been established on
> Github.
>
> Github repo setup and CJDB has been adding issues
> https://github.com/cplusplus/SG20/
>
> https://github.com/cplusplus/SG20/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen
>
>
> CJDB: explains the issue structure
> modules as labels
> and topics as issues
> each topic is thus assigned to one or more modules.
>
> NH: We had suggested having a couple of initial examples, for people to
> follow
> JC: Agreed, that is a good plan.
>
> Discussion of which module/topic to start with.
> * meta error handling
> * functions
> * I/O
>
> NH: the intention is to establish objectives and outcomes for each topic?
> CJDB: yes
>
> KG expressed a preference towards functions or IO rather than meta-error
> handling
> CJDB: I/O is more or less ready to go, functions is not.
> JC: not so keen to start with functions.
>
> ACTION: CJDB will continue to populate the tracker.
> ACTION: (unassigned) An initial "template" topic should be developed to
> set the direction for other.
> FUTURE ACTION: Assign topics to individuals.
> (scribe note: from Belfast we had noted that once the tracker is up,
> people can self select topics using the issue tracker)
>
> Prague attendance: SG20 face to face
> yes: NH, JC, FS, CJDB
> no : KG, MA
>
> ----------------------
> --
> SG20 mailing list
> SG20_at_[hidden]
> https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/sg20
>