I would like to spend some time in a telecon to confirm whether we
want to recommend the full removal of the facets that we opted to
deprecate in this standard. I am happy to do that in yet-another
revision of P2873 though, so I can publish this version in the post
meeting mailing.

Thanks.

AlisdairM

> On 5 Jul 2024, at 23:32, Tom Honermann <tom_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
> Hi, Alisdair. I don’t see a reason to hold off on removing the already deprecated facets. I would be happy to have the incorrectly added facets removed as well; I can’t imagine there are any actual uses of them. We can form a recommendation in SG16 is you like, but I think this can go straight to LEWG.
>
> Tom.
>
>> On Jul 5, 2024, at 2:20 PM, Alisdair Meredith via SG16 <sg16_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>>
>> Should I hold on for a week in case of feedback?
>> Or turn this into a P doc, targeting LEWG, and submit
>> to the mailing on Monday?
>>
>> Trying to clear my inbox so I can keep making progress :)
>>
>> AlisdairM
>>
>>> On 2 Jul 2024, at 11:39, Alisdair Meredith via SG16 <sg16_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>>>
>>> Thanks for correcting the link :)
>>>
>>> I have just uploaded an update with only editorial clean-up.
>>>
>>> I am particularly interested in post-Tokyo opinions now that
>>> two more code conversion facets have been deprecated.
>>>
>>> Should we hold off on removing the originally deprecated
>>> facets until we can cleanly remove all such facets at once?
>>>
>>> Should we more aggressively remove the not-previously
>>> deprecated facets from C++20, that probably have minimal
>>> use yet?
>>>
>>> Or should we proceed with the original plan of removing
>>> just the facets that were deprecated back in C++20?
>>>
>>> AlisdairM
>>>
>>>>> On 30 Jun 2024, at 09:50, Victor Zverovich <victor.zverovich_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for the update, Alisdair. BTW here is the correct link: https://wg21.link/d2873r2 (the original one gave 404 for me).
>>>>
>>>> - Victor
>>>>
>>>>> On Sat, Jun 29, 2024 at 11:01 AM Alisdair Meredith via SG16 <sg16_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>>>> I have updated P2873 onto the current working draft, and added
>>>> an introduction to code conversion facets so that non-expert iostreams
>>>> folks should be in a position to review the paper.
>>>>
>>>> Please comment on my introduction and highlight any errors or issues
>>>> that need clarification, and any other outstanding comments you have
>>>> would be helpful too.
>>>>
>>>> The goal is to push this into the July mailing.
>>>>
>>>> Https://wg21.link/d2873r2.pdf
>>>>
>>>> AlisdairM
>>>> --
>>>> SG16 mailing list
>>>> SG16_at_[hidden]
>>>> https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/sg16
>>>
>>> --
>>> SG16 mailing list
>>> SG16_at_[hidden]
>>> https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/sg16
>>
>> --
>> SG16 mailing list
>> SG16_at_[hidden]
>> https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/sg16
>