Date: Fri, 5 Jul 2024 23:32:12 -0400
Hi, Alisdair. I don’t see a reason to hold off on removing the already deprecated facets. I would be happy to have the incorrectly added facets removed as well; I can’t imagine there are any actual uses of them. We can form a recommendation in SG16 is you like, but I think this can go straight to LEWG.
Tom.
> On Jul 5, 2024, at 2:20 PM, Alisdair Meredith via SG16 <sg16_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
> Should I hold on for a week in case of feedback?
> Or turn this into a P doc, targeting LEWG, and submit
> to the mailing on Monday?
>
> Trying to clear my inbox so I can keep making progress :)
>
> AlisdairM
>
>> On 2 Jul 2024, at 11:39, Alisdair Meredith via SG16 <sg16_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>>
>> Thanks for correcting the link :)
>>
>> I have just uploaded an update with only editorial clean-up.
>>
>> I am particularly interested in post-Tokyo opinions now that
>> two more code conversion facets have been deprecated.
>>
>> Should we hold off on removing the originally deprecated
>> facets until we can cleanly remove all such facets at once?
>>
>> Should we more aggressively remove the not-previously
>> deprecated facets from C++20, that probably have minimal
>> use yet?
>>
>> Or should we proceed with the original plan of removing
>> just the facets that were deprecated back in C++20?
>>
>> AlisdairM
>>
>>>> On 30 Jun 2024, at 09:50, Victor Zverovich <victor.zverovich_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>>>
>>> Thanks for the update, Alisdair. BTW here is the correct link: https://wg21.link/d2873r2 (the original one gave 404 for me).
>>>
>>> - Victor
>>>
>>>> On Sat, Jun 29, 2024 at 11:01 AM Alisdair Meredith via SG16 <sg16_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>>> I have updated P2873 onto the current working draft, and added
>>> an introduction to code conversion facets so that non-expert iostreams
>>> folks should be in a position to review the paper.
>>>
>>> Please comment on my introduction and highlight any errors or issues
>>> that need clarification, and any other outstanding comments you have
>>> would be helpful too.
>>>
>>> The goal is to push this into the July mailing.
>>>
>>> Https://wg21.link/d2873r2.pdf
>>>
>>> AlisdairM
>>> --
>>> SG16 mailing list
>>> SG16_at_[hidden]
>>> https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/sg16
>>
>> --
>> SG16 mailing list
>> SG16_at_[hidden]
>> https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/sg16
>
> --
> SG16 mailing list
> SG16_at_[hidden]
> https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/sg16
Tom.
> On Jul 5, 2024, at 2:20 PM, Alisdair Meredith via SG16 <sg16_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
> Should I hold on for a week in case of feedback?
> Or turn this into a P doc, targeting LEWG, and submit
> to the mailing on Monday?
>
> Trying to clear my inbox so I can keep making progress :)
>
> AlisdairM
>
>> On 2 Jul 2024, at 11:39, Alisdair Meredith via SG16 <sg16_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>>
>> Thanks for correcting the link :)
>>
>> I have just uploaded an update with only editorial clean-up.
>>
>> I am particularly interested in post-Tokyo opinions now that
>> two more code conversion facets have been deprecated.
>>
>> Should we hold off on removing the originally deprecated
>> facets until we can cleanly remove all such facets at once?
>>
>> Should we more aggressively remove the not-previously
>> deprecated facets from C++20, that probably have minimal
>> use yet?
>>
>> Or should we proceed with the original plan of removing
>> just the facets that were deprecated back in C++20?
>>
>> AlisdairM
>>
>>>> On 30 Jun 2024, at 09:50, Victor Zverovich <victor.zverovich_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>>>
>>> Thanks for the update, Alisdair. BTW here is the correct link: https://wg21.link/d2873r2 (the original one gave 404 for me).
>>>
>>> - Victor
>>>
>>>> On Sat, Jun 29, 2024 at 11:01 AM Alisdair Meredith via SG16 <sg16_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>>> I have updated P2873 onto the current working draft, and added
>>> an introduction to code conversion facets so that non-expert iostreams
>>> folks should be in a position to review the paper.
>>>
>>> Please comment on my introduction and highlight any errors or issues
>>> that need clarification, and any other outstanding comments you have
>>> would be helpful too.
>>>
>>> The goal is to push this into the July mailing.
>>>
>>> Https://wg21.link/d2873r2.pdf
>>>
>>> AlisdairM
>>> --
>>> SG16 mailing list
>>> SG16_at_[hidden]
>>> https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/sg16
>>
>> --
>> SG16 mailing list
>> SG16_at_[hidden]
>> https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/sg16
>
> --
> SG16 mailing list
> SG16_at_[hidden]
> https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/sg16
Received on 2024-07-06 03:32:29