Should I hold on for a week in case of feedback?
Or turn this into a P doc, targeting LEWG, and submit
to the mailing on Monday?

Trying to clear my inbox so I can keep making progress :)

AlisdairM

> On 2 Jul 2024, at 11:39, Alisdair Meredith via SG16 <sg16_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
> Thanks for correcting the link :)
>
> I have just uploaded an update with only editorial clean-up.
>
> I am particularly interested in post-Tokyo opinions now that
> two more code conversion facets have been deprecated.
>
> Should we hold off on removing the originally deprecated
> facets until we can cleanly remove all such facets at once?
>
> Should we more aggressively remove the not-previously
> deprecated facets from C++20, that probably have minimal
> use yet?
>
> Or should we proceed with the original plan of removing
> just the facets that were deprecated back in C++20?
>
> AlisdairM
>
>> On 30 Jun 2024, at 09:50, Victor Zverovich <victor.zverovich_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>>
>> Thanks for the update, Alisdair. BTW here is the correct link: https://wg21.link/d2873r2 (the original one gave 404 for me).
>>
>> - Victor
>>
>> On Sat, Jun 29, 2024 at 11:01 AM Alisdair Meredith via SG16 <sg16_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>> I have updated P2873 onto the current working draft, and added
>> an introduction to code conversion facets so that non-expert iostreams
>> folks should be in a position to review the paper.
>>
>> Please comment on my introduction and highlight any errors or issues
>> that need clarification, and any other outstanding comments you have
>> would be helpful too.
>>
>> The goal is to push this into the July mailing.
>>
>> Https://wg21.link/d2873r2.pdf
>>
>> AlisdairM
>> --
>> SG16 mailing list
>> SG16_at_[hidden]
>> https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/sg16
>
> --
> SG16 mailing list
> SG16_at_[hidden]
> https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/sg16