Ok, sounds good.

Tom.

> On Jul 6, 2024, at 2:07 AM, Alisdair Meredith <alisdairm_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
> I would like to spend some time in a telecon to confirm whether we
> want to recommend the full removal of the facets that we opted to
> deprecate in this standard. I am happy to do that in yet-another
> revision of P2873 though, so I can publish this version in the post
> meeting mailing.
>
> Thanks.
>
> AlisdairM
>
>> On 5 Jul 2024, at 23:32, Tom Honermann <tom_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>>
>> Hi, Alisdair. I don’t see a reason to hold off on removing the already deprecated facets. I would be happy to have the incorrectly added facets removed as well; I can’t imagine there are any actual uses of them. We can form a recommendation in SG16 is you like, but I think this can go straight to LEWG.
>>
>> Tom.
>>
>>>> On Jul 5, 2024, at 2:20 PM, Alisdair Meredith via SG16 <sg16_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>>>
>>> Should I hold on for a week in case of feedback?
>>> Or turn this into a P doc, targeting LEWG, and submit
>>> to the mailing on Monday?
>>>
>>> Trying to clear my inbox so I can keep making progress :)
>>>
>>> AlisdairM
>>>
>>>> On 2 Jul 2024, at 11:39, Alisdair Meredith via SG16 <sg16_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for correcting the link :)
>>>>
>>>> I have just uploaded an update with only editorial clean-up.
>>>>
>>>> I am particularly interested in post-Tokyo opinions now that
>>>> two more code conversion facets have been deprecated.
>>>>
>>>> Should we hold off on removing the originally deprecated
>>>> facets until we can cleanly remove all such facets at once?
>>>>
>>>> Should we more aggressively remove the not-previously
>>>> deprecated facets from C++20, that probably have minimal
>>>> use yet?
>>>>
>>>> Or should we proceed with the original plan of removing
>>>> just the facets that were deprecated back in C++20?
>>>>
>>>> AlisdairM
>>>>
>>>>>> On 30 Jun 2024, at 09:50, Victor Zverovich <victor.zverovich_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks for the update, Alisdair. BTW here is the correct link: https://wg21.link/d2873r2 (the original one gave 404 for me).
>>>>>
>>>>> - Victor
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sat, Jun 29, 2024 at 11:01 AM Alisdair Meredith via SG16 <sg16_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>>>>> I have updated P2873 onto the current working draft, and added
>>>>> an introduction to code conversion facets so that non-expert iostreams
>>>>> folks should be in a position to review the paper.
>>>>>
>>>>> Please comment on my introduction and highlight any errors or issues
>>>>> that need clarification, and any other outstanding comments you have
>>>>> would be helpful too.
>>>>>
>>>>> The goal is to push this into the July mailing.
>>>>>
>>>>> Https://wg21.link/d2873r2.pdf
>>>>>
>>>>> AlisdairM
>>>>> --
>>>>> SG16 mailing list
>>>>> SG16_at_[hidden]
>>>>> https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/sg16
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> SG16 mailing list
>>>> SG16_at_[hidden]
>>>> https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/sg16
>>>
>>> --
>>> SG16 mailing list
>>> SG16_at_[hidden]
>>> https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/sg16
>>
>