This is great, thank you very much!

On Sun, Sep 18, 2022 at 12:03 PM Daniel Krügler <daniel.kruegler_at_[hidden]>
wrote:

> Am So., 18. Sept. 2022 um 11:49 Uhr schrieb Corentin <
> corentin.jabot_at_[hidden]>:
> >
> > On Sun, Sep 18, 2022 at 11:30 AM Daniel Krügler <
> daniel.kruegler_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi Corentin,
> >>
> >> I just realize that your proposed annex entries uses ".." to separate
> >> ranges of code points while our existing wording in
> >> [format.string.std] uses an n-dash. Would it be OK to replace those
> >> ".." by n-dashes? I'm asking it right now, because it would become a
> >> horribly work to change those afterwards as part of some SUPERSEDED
> >> wording.
> >
> > Thanks a lot for creating this issue.
> > It will be helpful for my related nb comment.
> > That list was intended to be informational, I did not intend for it to
> be part of the issue. sorry about the confusion.
> > If people want an Annex C, I think i would have to generate a list based
> on Unicode 13 instead of 15 - and sure, if we want that I'd format it
> > in the most convenient way for you.
> > In the meantime, please feel free to remove the list entirely, or to
> move it to the description section.
> > Would that work for you?
>
> Sure, thanks for the quick feedback. How about the following issue
> representation:
>
> https://cplusplus.github.io/LWG/issue3780
>
> ?
>
> Let me know if you would like to see further adjustments.
>
> - Daniel
>