Am So., 18. Sept. 2022 um 11:49 Uhr schrieb Corentin <corentin.jabot_at_[hidden]>:
>
> On Sun, Sep 18, 2022 at 11:30 AM Daniel Krügler <daniel.kruegler_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Corentin,
>>
>> I just realize that your proposed annex entries uses ".." to separate
>> ranges of code points while our existing wording in
>> [format.string.std] uses an n-dash. Would it be OK to replace those
>> ".." by n-dashes? I'm asking it right now, because it would become a
>> horribly work to change those afterwards as part of some SUPERSEDED
>> wording.
>
> Thanks a lot for creating this issue.
> It will be helpful for my related nb comment.
> That list was intended to be informational, I did not intend for it to be part of the issue. sorry about the confusion.
> If people want an Annex C, I think i would have to generate a list based on Unicode 13 instead of 15 - and sure, if we want that I'd format it
> in the most convenient way for you.
> In the meantime, please feel free to remove the list entirely, or to move it to the description section.
> Would that work for you?

Sure, thanks for the quick feedback. How about the following issue
representation:

https://cplusplus.github.io/LWG/issue3780

?

Let me know if you would like to see further adjustments.

- Daniel