On Thu, Apr 29, 2021, 12:39 Peter Brett <pbrett_at_[hidden]> wrote:

> Hi Corentin,
>
>
>
> I think this is a big improvement!
>
>
>
> Does anyone know what “physical” means in [lex.phases]:1? I feel like we
> could remove both occurrences of “physical” from this paragraph without any
> normative effect.
>
>
>
> There is an obvious incomplete merge with P2314, in that the current P2295
> wording suggests that UCN doesn’t occur for UTF-8 source files. Just to
> clarify this, please could we insert a paragraph break before “Any source
> file character…”?
>
Certainly!

>
>
> I don’t have any concerns about forwarding this paper to EWG in its
> current form.
>
>
>
> Best regards,
>
>
>
> Peter
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* SG16 <sg16-bounces_at_[hidden]> *On Behalf Of *Corentin via
> SG16
> *Sent:* 29 April 2021 08:35
> *To:* SG16 <sg16_at_[hidden]>
> *Cc:* Corentin <corentin.jabot_at_[hidden]>
> *Subject:* [SG16] P2295R3 Support for UTF-8 as a portable source file
> encoding
>
>
>
> EXTERNAL MAIL
>
> Per request in yesterday's meeting,
>
> here is P2295R3 Support for UTF-8 as a portable source file encoding.
>
>
>
> I am looking forward to your feedback
>
>
>
> http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2021/p2295r3.pdf
> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__http:/www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2021/p2295r3.pdf__;!!EHscmS1ygiU1lA!XaO4EGAyt6UeI1vxk8b0nQ_eprHj_DnOwoz0W7Ql_YPrpGZJkaTnisiu138yiQ$>
>