C++ Logo

SG16

Advanced search

Subject: Re: SG16 meeting summary for February 10th, 2021
From: Tom Honermann (tom_at_[hidden])
Date: 2021-02-24 09:31:53


Fixed, thank you, Hubert!

I knew someone had left before the poll (which is why the attendance
count for the poll didn't match the count of meeting attendees), but I
couldn't recall who had left.

Tom.

On 2/24/21 10:24 AM, Hubert Tong wrote:
> Hi Tom,
>
> I would like to suggest the following:
>
> Hubert noted that the literal encoding and the locale encoding are
> distinct, but that P1885 would allow differentiating them.
> =>
> Hubert noted that the literal encoding and the locale encoding are
> distinct, and although P1885 would allow differentiating them, we
> still have not standardized (in C or C++) facilities to transcode from
> the literal encoding.
>
> Poll: Forward P2093R3 to LEWG..
> <=
> Please note that the poll occurred after Hubert left at the end of the
> time scheduled for the meeting.
>
> Thanks,
>
>
> Hubert Tong
>
> On Sun, Feb 21, 2021 at 11:57 PM Tom Honermann via SG16
> <sg16_at_[hidden] <mailto:sg16_at_[hidden]>> wrote:
>
> The summary for the SG16 meeting held February 10th, 2021 is now
> available.  For those that attended, please review and suggest
> corrections:
>
> * https://github.com/sg16-unicode/sg16-meetings#february-10th-2021
>
> Tom.
>
> --
> SG16 mailing list
> SG16_at_[hidden] <mailto:SG16_at_[hidden]>
> https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/sg16
>



SG16 list run by sg16-owner@lists.isocpp.org