Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2021 17:37:58 -0500
That's just me being behind again. We will meet next Wednesday,
February 10th at the usual time. I'll try and get the calendar entries
and invites out later tonight.
Tom.
On 2/4/21 5:36 PM, Hubert Tong wrote:
> No problem, thanks! Also, I'm not seeing calendar entries for this month?
>
> -- HT
>
> On Thu, Feb 4, 2021 at 11:31 AM Tom Honermann <tom_at_[hidden]
> <mailto:tom_at_[hidden]>> wrote:
>
> On 1/30/21 4:05 PM, Hubert Tong wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 1:16 AM Tom Honermann via SG16
>> <sg16_at_[hidden] <mailto:sg16_at_[hidden]>> wrote:
>>
>> The summary for the SG16 meeting held January 13th, 2020 is
>> now available. For those that attended, please review and
>> suggest corrections:
>>
>> * https://github.com/sg16-unicode/sg16-meetings#january-13th-2021
>>
>> Thanks Tom for the notes. I'd like to request the following
>> change from:
>> Hubert responded affirmatively; that he would like to see a
>> change of rationale to require some representation of the text.
>>
>> to:
>> Hubert responded affirmatively; that he would like to see a
>> change of the rationale to clarify that there is no increase in
>> requirement for some representation of the text in comparison to
>> the status quo.
>>
> Fixed, thank you! (and sorry for the delayed response!)
>
> Tom.
>
February 10th at the usual time. I'll try and get the calendar entries
and invites out later tonight.
Tom.
On 2/4/21 5:36 PM, Hubert Tong wrote:
> No problem, thanks! Also, I'm not seeing calendar entries for this month?
>
> -- HT
>
> On Thu, Feb 4, 2021 at 11:31 AM Tom Honermann <tom_at_[hidden]
> <mailto:tom_at_[hidden]>> wrote:
>
> On 1/30/21 4:05 PM, Hubert Tong wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 1:16 AM Tom Honermann via SG16
>> <sg16_at_[hidden] <mailto:sg16_at_[hidden]>> wrote:
>>
>> The summary for the SG16 meeting held January 13th, 2020 is
>> now available. For those that attended, please review and
>> suggest corrections:
>>
>> * https://github.com/sg16-unicode/sg16-meetings#january-13th-2021
>>
>> Thanks Tom for the notes. I'd like to request the following
>> change from:
>> Hubert responded affirmatively; that he would like to see a
>> change of rationale to require some representation of the text.
>>
>> to:
>> Hubert responded affirmatively; that he would like to see a
>> change of the rationale to clarify that there is no increase in
>> requirement for some representation of the text in comparison to
>> the status quo.
>>
> Fixed, thank you! (and sorry for the delayed response!)
>
> Tom.
>
Received on 2021-02-04 16:38:00