Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2021 17:36:16 -0500
No problem, thanks! Also, I'm not seeing calendar entries for this month?
-- HT
On Thu, Feb 4, 2021 at 11:31 AM Tom Honermann <tom_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> On 1/30/21 4:05 PM, Hubert Tong wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 1:16 AM Tom Honermann via SG16 <
> sg16_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
>> The summary for the SG16 meeting held January 13th, 2020 is now
>> available. For those that attended, please review and suggest corrections:
>>
>> - https://github.com/sg16-unicode/sg16-meetings#january-13th-2021
>>
>> Thanks Tom for the notes. I'd like to request the following change from:
> Hubert responded affirmatively; that he would like to see a change of
> rationale to require some representation of the text.
>
> to:
> Hubert responded affirmatively; that he would like to see a change of the
> rationale to clarify that there is no increase in requirement for some
> representation of the text in comparison to the status quo.
>
> Fixed, thank you! (and sorry for the delayed response!)
>
> Tom.
>
-- HT
On Thu, Feb 4, 2021 at 11:31 AM Tom Honermann <tom_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> On 1/30/21 4:05 PM, Hubert Tong wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 1:16 AM Tom Honermann via SG16 <
> sg16_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
>> The summary for the SG16 meeting held January 13th, 2020 is now
>> available. For those that attended, please review and suggest corrections:
>>
>> - https://github.com/sg16-unicode/sg16-meetings#january-13th-2021
>>
>> Thanks Tom for the notes. I'd like to request the following change from:
> Hubert responded affirmatively; that he would like to see a change of
> rationale to require some representation of the text.
>
> to:
> Hubert responded affirmatively; that he would like to see a change of the
> rationale to clarify that there is no increase in requirement for some
> representation of the text in comparison to the status quo.
>
> Fixed, thank you! (and sorry for the delayed response!)
>
> Tom.
>
Received on 2021-02-04 16:36:45