C++ Logo


Advanced search

Re: [SG16] SG16 meeting summary for December 9th, 2020

From: Victor Zverovich <victor.zverovich_at_[hidden]>
Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2020 08:15:27 -0800
Hi Tom,

Thanks for putting together meeting notes. All looks good with two minor

* Russian console encoding is CP866, not CP868.

* I can confirm that there was a mistake in the Java experiment results in
the slides presented at the meeting (sorry for that): Java didn't produce a
correct UTF-8 file but a file that was in CP1251 with replacement
characters. I see the notes already mention that which is great. The paper
will contain the correct results and I've added validation code to make
sure that the strings are actually in some UTF as discussed at the meeting.

Happy New Year!

On Mon, Dec 28, 2020 at 10:11 PM Tom Honermann via SG16 <
sg16_at_[hidden]> wrote:

> The summary for the SG16 meeting held December 9th, 2020 is now
> available. For those that attended, please review and suggest corrections:
> - https://github.com/sg16-unicode/sg16-meetings#december-9th-2020
> No decisions were made at this meeting.
> The next meeting is scheduled for Wednesday, January 13th, from
> 19:30-21:00 UTC (timezone conversion
> <https://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/converter.html?iso=20210113T193000&p1=1440&p2=tz_pst&p3=tz_mst&p4=tz_cst&p5=tz_est&p6=tz_cet>).
> The draft agenda is:
> - P2246R0: Character encoding of diagnostic text
> <https://wg21.link/p2246r0>
> - And companion paper: WG14 N2563: Character encoding of diagnostic
> text <http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/n2563.pdf>
> - SG16, SG22, and WG14 coordination.
> - Priority and owners for SG16's open WG14 issues
> <https://github.com/sg16-unicode/sg16/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+label%3Awg14>
> - WG14 N2620: Restartable and Non-Restartable Functions for Efficient
> Character Conversions | r4
> <http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/n2620.htm>
> We'll try to wrap up discussion and polling of P2246R0
> <https://wg21.link/p2246r0> in the first 30 minutes. Please read both
> P2246R0 <https://wg21.link/p2246r0> and WG14 N2563
> <http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/n2563.pdf> prior to the
> telecon.
> Discussion of coordination with SG22 and WG14 is expected to be short;
> perhaps 15 minutes. Please review the SG16 open issues tagged as WG14
> <https://github.com/sg16-unicode/sg16/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+label%3Awg14>
> ahead of time and consider whether you can offer assistance moving them
> along. In particular, I'd like to find owners for the WG14 equivalents of
> P1949 (C++ Identifier Syntax using Unicode Standard Annex 31) and P1041
> (Make char16_t/char32_t string literals be UTF-16/32).
> The remainder of the telecon will focus on socializing and reviewing
> JeanHeyd's work on WG14 N2620
> <http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/n2620.htm>. This is a
> fairly long paper, so please set aside some time to read it. We won't
> delve into the proposed wording, but for the standardeze lovers out there,
> reading just the wording will give you a good sense of what the paper is
> about (but please try and read sections 2-4 as well).
> Polls to forward P2246R0 to EWG are expected. Direction polls for WG14
> N2620 may be taken.
> For any new attendees: The meetings are video conferences conducted via
> Zoom. If you are planning to attend, please test your system by visiting
> https://zoom.us/test before the scheduled meeting time.
> Tom.
> --
> SG16 mailing list
> SG16_at_[hidden]
> https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/sg16

Received on 2020-12-31 10:15:42