I performed a stare and compare between the version attached to this
email thread and the version that was presented to EWG and is attached
to the wiki as
http://wiki.edg.com/pub/Wg21prague/EvolutionWorkingGroup/D1949R2.html.

As best I can tell, the edits are faithful to what was presented. Thank
you, Steve!

A couple of nits:

  * In section 6, there is a repeated bit of text: "C++. C++."
  * In section 9, (X.7), there is a missing end line such that the
    paragraph content appears on the same line as the rule.

Tom.

On 2/22/20 1:46 PM, Steve Downey via SG16 wrote:
> Attached are the revised P1949 paper pulling back the changes from
> D1949R2 as presented and the original source. I've also fixed up
> formatting problems. The markdown is the original source and is
> transformed using Michael Parks's wg21 paper system.
> https://github.com/mpark/wg21 and
> https://mpark.github.io/programming/2018/11/16/how-i-format-my-cpp-papers/ .
>
>
> Source for p1949 is
> https://github.com/steve-downey/papers/blob/master/p1949.md
>
> As this is intended to capture the paper as presented, please just
> review that it is accurate in that regard. However, I'm absolutely
> open to any edits or suggestions for R3. In particular, for R3 (or 4)
> in Varna I'll want to make sure the body of the paper reflects and
> supports the wording, because I hate when they don't.
>