Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2019 22:46:34 -0400
On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 8:57 AM Corentin Jabot <corentinjabot_at_[hidden]>
wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, 13 Aug 2019 at 14:52, Ville Voutilainen <
> ville.voutilainen_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 13 Aug 2019 at 15:35, Corentin Jabot via Core
>> <core_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > Chiming in with my favorite solution:> Forbid u8/u16/u32 literals in
>> non unicode encoded files
>>
>> But presumably not the ones that look like u8"\U1234" ?
>>
>
> Yes, there is no reason to disallow that as It can't be misinterpreted by
> neither the compiler or people (and quite a lot of code would needlessly
> break)
>
>
I find your lack of faith in people's ability to misinterpret something
disturbing.
:-)
wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, 13 Aug 2019 at 14:52, Ville Voutilainen <
> ville.voutilainen_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 13 Aug 2019 at 15:35, Corentin Jabot via Core
>> <core_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > Chiming in with my favorite solution:> Forbid u8/u16/u32 literals in
>> non unicode encoded files
>>
>> But presumably not the ones that look like u8"\U1234" ?
>>
>
> Yes, there is no reason to disallow that as It can't be misinterpreted by
> neither the compiler or people (and quite a lot of code would needlessly
> break)
>
>
I find your lack of faith in people's ability to misinterpret something
disturbing.
:-)
-- Be seeing you, Tony
Received on 2019-08-14 04:46:47