Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2019 10:05:18 +0100
Was this not most of what Niall Douglas' proposal was for alternate memory?
On Thu, 7 Feb 2019 at 09:12, Bryce Adelstein Lelbach aka wash <
brycelelbach_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> I agree; a new io library is a high priority thing for me.
>
> On Sun, Feb 3, 2019, 5:44 AM Lyberta <lyberta_at_[hidden] wrote:
>
>> Since we introduced char8_t but not char8_t-based streams, early users
>> of char8_t will face significant difficulties working with char8_t based
>> data. I think we should let iostreams die and think of something simpler
>> that uses std::byte and then build text I/O on top of it.
>>
>> Ideas?
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> SG16 Unicode mailing list
>> Unicode_at_[hidden]
>> http://www.open-std.org/mailman/listinfo/unicode
>>
> _______________________________________________
> SG16 Unicode mailing list
> Unicode_at_[hidden]
> http://www.open-std.org/mailman/listinfo/unicode
>
On Thu, 7 Feb 2019 at 09:12, Bryce Adelstein Lelbach aka wash <
brycelelbach_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> I agree; a new io library is a high priority thing for me.
>
> On Sun, Feb 3, 2019, 5:44 AM Lyberta <lyberta_at_[hidden] wrote:
>
>> Since we introduced char8_t but not char8_t-based streams, early users
>> of char8_t will face significant difficulties working with char8_t based
>> data. I think we should let iostreams die and think of something simpler
>> that uses std::byte and then build text I/O on top of it.
>>
>> Ideas?
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> SG16 Unicode mailing list
>> Unicode_at_[hidden]
>> http://www.open-std.org/mailman/listinfo/unicode
>>
> _______________________________________________
> SG16 Unicode mailing list
> Unicode_at_[hidden]
> http://www.open-std.org/mailman/listinfo/unicode
>
Received on 2019-02-07 10:05:31