Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2019 00:11:52 -0800
I agree; a new io library is a high priority thing for me.
On Sun, Feb 3, 2019, 5:44 AM Lyberta <lyberta_at_[hidden] wrote:
> Since we introduced char8_t but not char8_t-based streams, early users
> of char8_t will face significant difficulties working with char8_t based
> data. I think we should let iostreams die and think of something simpler
> that uses std::byte and then build text I/O on top of it.
>
> Ideas?
>
> _______________________________________________
> SG16 Unicode mailing list
> Unicode_at_[hidden]
> http://www.open-std.org/mailman/listinfo/unicode
>
On Sun, Feb 3, 2019, 5:44 AM Lyberta <lyberta_at_[hidden] wrote:
> Since we introduced char8_t but not char8_t-based streams, early users
> of char8_t will face significant difficulties working with char8_t based
> data. I think we should let iostreams die and think of something simpler
> that uses std::byte and then build text I/O on top of it.
>
> Ideas?
>
> _______________________________________________
> SG16 Unicode mailing list
> Unicode_at_[hidden]
> http://www.open-std.org/mailman/listinfo/unicode
>
Received on 2019-02-07 09:12:07